Skip to main content
· 10/20/2014

Waddy v. United States

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 422
  • 190 L. Ed. 2d 306
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3235
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to apply equitable estoppel because there was neither express nor implied agreement not to assert statute of limitations
  • refusing to apply equitable estoppel because there was neither express nor implied agreement not to assert statute of limitations
  • finding no estoppel because there was neither express nor implied agreement not to act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.