Waddell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where, as here, there was evidence to sustain a conviction for kidnapping with the intent to ‘[ijnflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim’ under section 787.01(l)(a)(3), the Faison test has no applicability.” (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sutton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-03· cited 18×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-18· cited 18×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 17×
• Biggs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 13×
• McCutcheon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-27· cited 10×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-25· cited 8×
• Conner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-14· cited 6×
• State v. Lumarque
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-24· cited 3×
• Perry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-22· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faison v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-10· cited 228×
• Bedford v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-10-10· cited 37×
• Chaeld v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-18· cited 12×