Waddell v. Simpson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Congress is pre- sumed to know the law and to have incorporated judicial interpretations when adopting a preexisting remedial scheme”
• holding that “Title II's statutory 24 language does not prohibit . . . injunctive action against state officials in their official 25 capacities”
• holding that the denial of a defense to suit based on a statutory bar to relief under § 1983 is not immediately appealable under the collateral TANEDO V . EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCH . BD . 9 order doctrine
• holding “Title II’s statutory language does not prohibit [the plaintiff’s] injunctive action against state officials in their official capacities”
• following “the Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits in holding that Title II’s statutory language does not prohibit [the plaintiff’s] injunctive action against state officials in their official capacities”
• declining to disturb Circuit’s “settled precedent” that Congress validly 11 abrogated sovereign immunity under Title II when intervening Supreme Court precedent 12 “addressed only Title I of the ADA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).