Waddell v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To succeed in this collateral attack, Waddell must show that the judgment is void under Indiana law. Thus, his discussion regarding our CR 4.05-4.07 and the procedure outlined therein for a warning order are completely irrelevant.”
• “To succeed in this collateral attack, Waddell must show that the judgment is void under Indiana law. Thus, his discussion regarding our CR 4.05- 4.07 and the procedure outlined therein for a warning order are completely irrelevant.”
• father, served by publication, held not entitled to relief from judgment of paternity due to insufficiency of service of process where “the uncontradicted facts fail to demonstrate that [he] was amenable to any other method of service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ramirez v. Commonwealth ex rel. Brooks
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-11-17· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Mueller v. Mueller
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-10-12· cited 28×
• Smith v. Tisdal
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-10-22· cited 23×
• Marriage of Bays v. Bays
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-02-20· cited 23×
• Milosavljevic v. Brooks
  N.D. Indiana· 1972-06-23· cited 19×
• Blackgold Exploration Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-01-09· cited 6×
• Dant v. Progress Paint Manufacturing Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1958-01-17· cited 3×