Waclaw Skoczylas v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that no manifest injustice would result from government’s inability to rely upon “a now-obsolete procedural loophole” under the amended rules
• finding that the only proper defendant for the plaintiff's discrimination claims was “the head of the department, agency, or unit” (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16{c)
• fact that the express purpose in amending the rule was to remedy the exact problem presented considered relevant in evaluating whether amendments should be applied retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).