Wachtel by and Through Wachtel v. Beer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff continuance to respond to summary judgment where plaintiffs expert needed defendants’ depositions before rendering opinion
• trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff continuance to respond to summary judgment where plaintiff's expert needed defendants' depositions before rendering opinion
• Rule 56(f) motion “must contain a reasonable excuse or good cause, explaining why a party is presently unable to offer evidence essential to justify opposition to the motion for summary judgments and] should be applied liberally.”
• Rule 56(f) motion “must contain a reasonable excuse or good cause, explaining why a party is presently unable to offer evidence essential to justify opposition to the motion for summary judgment[, and] should be applied liberally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).