Skip to main content
· 5/10/1938

Wachsman v. Robaczynski Mach. Corp.

Citations

  • 23 F. Supp. 527
  • 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[p]rejudice can range along a continuum from an inability to prove claims to little or no impact on the presentation of proof”
  • noting that “[p]rejudice can range along a continuum from an inability to prove claims to little or no impact on the presentation of proof”
  • ruling documents under the control of the litigant if it has the authority and practical ability to obtain the documents from a non-party
  • explaining that a court’s power to sanction pursuant Rule 37(b)(2) is broad
  • discussing how courts differ in the fault they assign where a party fails to implement a litigation hold
  • surveying cases that show how courts permit sanctions for failing to follow “a wide variety of orders” designed to provide or permit discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abruzzo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.