Wachovia Bank of Delaware, National Ass'n v. Gilliam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even in the context of a restricted appeal, we will not presume that process was forwarded to the address “required by statute” barring a certification to that effect
• stating that “for a default judgment to survive restricted appeal, the face of the record must reflect that service was forwarded to the address required by statute”
• vacating default judgment & remanding after concluding there was error on the face of the record related to service of process
• vacating a default judgment where \nothing on the face of the record\ showed compliance with the rules for service of process
• vacating a default judgment where \nothing on the face of the record\ showed compliance with the rules for service of process
• addressing a misunderstanding about the scope of the statement in Capitol Brick that was quoted in Cullever

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).