Skip to main content
· 7/13/2006

Wachovia Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. George C. Nunamann Trust v. United States

Citations

  • 455 F.3d 1261
  • 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5303
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17485
  • 2006 WL 1912805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when interpreting a statute, this Court cannot “read words or strings of [words] in isolation”
  • explaining that we consider words and provisions of a statute in the context of the overall statutory scheme because “context is king”
  • explaining court has no subject matter jurisdiction if requirements of § 7422(a) are not met
  • explaining that in statutory interpretation, \context is king\
  • explaining that in statutory interpretation, \context is king\
  • “[I]n order to determine the plain meaning of the statute we must consider both the particular statutory language at issue and the language and design of the statute as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Wilson, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.