· 7/13/2006
Wachovia Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. George C. Nunamann Trust v. United States
Citations
- 455 F.3d 1261
- 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5303
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17485
- 2006 WL 1912805
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, when interpreting a statute, this Court cannot “read words or strings of [words] in isolation”
- explaining that we consider words and provisions of a statute in the context of the overall statutory scheme because “context is king”
- explaining court has no subject matter jurisdiction if requirements of § 7422(a) are not met
- explaining that in statutory interpretation, \context is king\
- explaining that in statutory interpretation, \context is king\
- “[I]n order to determine the plain meaning of the statute we must consider both the particular statutory language at issue and the language and design of the statute as a whole.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carnes, Wilson, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.