Wacha v. Kandiyohi County Welfare Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• public bulletin that restated the requirements of a properly promulgated rule was not a new rule subject to MAPA rulemaking procedures
• Bulletin that was “merely a restatement of existing welfare policy and a directive concerning internal management” that “was intended merely to implement existing law” was “not a rule within the definition of a rule in the [Minnesota] Administrative Procedure Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).