Skip to main content
· 1/6/1930

Wabash Railway Co. v. Barclay

Citations

  • 280 U.S. 197
  • 50 S. Ct. 106
  • 74 L. Ed. 368
  • 1930 U.S. LEXIS 749
  • 67 A.L.R. 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • further noting that dividend payments are “in the first instance at least a matter for the directors to determine”
  • “When a man buys stock instead of bonds he takes a greater risk in the business. No one suggests that he has a right to dividends if there are no net earnings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.