Waag v. Permann (In Re Waag)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the award can postdate the petition date
• explaining that 14 in 2005, Congress restricted the chapter 13 “super discharge” by “expand[ing] the list of nondischargeable debts in section 1328(a)(2) to include, inter alia, those described in section 523(a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(4
• the two statutory sections 20 differ in significant ways and are not interchangeable
• “Based on the grammatical structure of section 1328(a)(4), the context in which it is used, and its policy and object, we agree . . . that it does not differentiate between a judgment entered prepetition and one entered postpetition.”
• discussing differences between § 523(a)(6) and § 1328(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).