WA Alliance of Tech. Workers v. DHS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[i]t is only when the proponent offers 'novel' 'scientific' evidence that the\ general acceptance standard applies
• stating that foundational reliability analysis under Rule 702 and Frye–Mack is nearly identical
• “[W]e may affirm a grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any grounds.”
• \The Frye -Mack standard governs the admissibility of expert testimony that involves a novel scientific theory.\
• “[I]n order to establish that there is a disputed material fact, the party against whom summary judgment was granted must present specific admissible facts showing a material fact issue.” (quotation omitted)
• “[I]n order to establish that there is a disputed material fact, the party against whom summary judgment was granted must present specific admissible facts showing a material fact issue.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).