· 1/21/1975
W. VA. HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N v. Tenpin Lounge, Inc.
Citations
- 211 S.E.2d 349
- 158 W. Va. 349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding appellant satisfied the diligence requirement because necessary questions were asked during voir dire and appellant “could do no more”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.