W. T. Sistrunk & Co. v. Meisenheimer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s supplemental declaration clearly proved the jurisdictional threshold when it showed records of a portion of the class “and determined that their claimed damages alone” exceeded $5 million
• denying a motion to remand when the defendants’ “objective and factually-grounded estimates,” including a detailed damages affidavit, “easily” established the requisite amount in controversy by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).