W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the applicant must show “that the use was lawful at the time a zoning ordinance or regulation went into effect” (internal quotation marks omitted and emphasis added)
• the applicant must show “that the use was lawful at the time a zoning ordinance or regulation went into effect” (internal quotation marks omitted and emphasis added)
• to prove the existence of a nonconforming use under ORS 215.130, the applicant must establish that the use continued uninter- rupted for a specified period of time and “that the use was lawful at the time a zoning ordinance or regulation went into effect” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).