W. M. W., Inc. v. Collier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that a car dealership’s demonstrator vehicle had a dealership “drive out tag” did not make employee’s use of the car automatically fall within his scope of employment, because the dealership derived only “incidental” advertising benefit from the tag
• where employee was driving a car dealership’s demonstrator vehicle when he collided with a motorcycle, dealership was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on its liability, because its employee was driving the vehicle outside his scope of employment at the time of the collision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).