W & M Properties of Connecticut, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing section 10(e) as a “jurisdictional bar” in the face of which we are “powerless . . . to consider arguments not made to the Board”
• affirming Board finding that an employer failed to satisfy its Wright Line rebuttal burden when it deviated from its alleged “neutral and objective hiring criteria,” thereby rendering those criteria “illusory”
• “Section 10 . . . creates and limits our jurisdiction to review the Board’s orders.”
• “Section 10 ... creates and limits our jurisdiction to review the Board’s orders.”
• granting summary enforcement after finding remedy objection unpreserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).