W L Harper Co. v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because courts have interpreted the relevant parts of the two statutes consistently, and because plaintiffs make no argument that any difference between the two statutes is relevant to this appeal, we focus our analysis on the ADA.”
• granting deference to federal regulations implementing the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).