· 5/8/1963
W. Harrison Price v. H. L. Coble Construction Company
Citations
- 317 F.2d 312
- 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding under Alabama’s version of Miller Act that subcontractor may recover contract price including profits for work performed
- reading the term “labor” in statutes similar to the Miller Act to encompass the work “of supervisors, engineers and architects”
- interpreting an Alabama statute patterned on the Miller Act to encompass work such as “selecting and securing the workmen” and “making up the payrolls and other reports” presented to the prime contractor
- interpreting an Alabama statute patterned on the Miller Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tuttle, Pope, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.