Skip to main content
· 7/22/1930

W. H. Hartman Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 20 B.T.A. 302
  • 1930 BTA LEXIS 2157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a reviewing court may resolve purely legal questions in determining the propriety of a preliminary injunction order
  • grant or denial of a preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, and party seeking injunction must show a well-grounded fear of immediate invasion of a clear legal or equitable right
  • ordinance is presumed constitutional; heavy burden rests on challenger to establish unconstitutionality
  • “In deciding whether a party [seeking relief through a preliminary injunction] has a clear legal or equitable right, the court examines the likelihood that the moving party will prevail on the merits. An injunction will not be issued in a doubtful case.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.