· 7/22/1930
W. H. Hartman Co. v. Commissioner
Citations
- 20 B.T.A. 302
- 1930 BTA LEXIS 2157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a reviewing court may resolve purely legal questions in determining the propriety of a preliminary injunction order
- grant or denial of a preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, and party seeking injunction must show a well-grounded fear of immediate invasion of a clear legal or equitable right
- ordinance is presumed constitutional; heavy burden rests on challenger to establish unconstitutionality
- “In deciding whether a party [seeking relief through a preliminary injunction] has a clear legal or equitable right, the court examines the likelihood that the moving party will prevail on the merits. An injunction will not be issued in a doubtful case.” (emphasis added
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moeris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.