W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik v. Action Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in finding that defendant had not suffered antitrust injury, court noted that “[t]he decision to stop importing [plaintiff’s product] was not made in response to a court order, but was instead a unilateral decision on the part of [the defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).