W. G. Cornell Company of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding legal error where the Board failed to consider trade practice and custom because of its holding that the contract was unambiguous
• evidence of trade custom and usage may not be used to vary or contradict contract language
• Contracting Officer must exercise his discretion reasonably and fairly.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).