Skip to main content
· 4/17/1919

W. F. Potts' Son & Co. v. Myers

Citations

  • 30 Del. 562
  • 7 Boyce 562
  • 109 A. 580
  • 1919 Del. LEXIS 72

Syllabus

<p>Sales—Nonshipment by Seller no Defense to Action for Breach Where Buyer Has Repudiated.</p> <p>Si» If seller, from information received by it as to buyer's sale of his business and leaving town, was justified in believing that the buyer, by his words, acts, or conduct, had rescinded his contract and would not receive the goods if shipped, it would not be precluded, by its nonshipment of the goods to the .buyer, from recovering for buyer’s breach of contract.</p>

Judges: Heisel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.