· 7/1/1879
W. Arnold & Co. v. D. C. Hockney & Bro.
Citations
- 51 Tex. 46
Syllabus
<p>1. Continuance—Material testimony.—See application for continuance held insufficient as a second application, the testimony sought not being material.</p> <p>2. Continuance—Practice.—A bill of exceptions to the overruling of an application should show whether it was a first or second application.</p>
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.