Vukich v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “Mr. Anderson, like the defendant in Gross, retained ownership of the [house where process served] but was actually residing at another abode”
• continuing delivery of mail to defendant at address where process served not determinative
• defendant presented unrefnted evidence of other residence included a lease, tenant’s statement, California bank account, California home purchase, and mail forwarding
• evidence in the form of the lease, tenant’s statement, bank account, and home purchase at another address was clear and convincing
• insufficiency of substitute service resulted in lack of personal jurisdiction
• insufficiency of substitute service resulted in lack of personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).