Skip to main content
· 9/9/1997

Vu v. California Commerce Club, Inc.

Citations

  • 58 Cal. App. 4th 229
  • 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 31
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7923
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 12723
  • 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that 4 plaintiffs’ claim for damages were based on speculation
  • rejecting conversion claim where the plaintiff could not identify specific sum but only approximate monetary losses
  • plaintiffs alleging breach of contract must show that their damages were proximately caused 4 by the defendant’s misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fukuto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.