· 9/9/1997
Vu v. California Commerce Club, Inc.
Citations
- 58 Cal. App. 4th 229
- 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 31
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7923
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 12723
- 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 812
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that 4 plaintiffs’ claim for damages were based on speculation
- rejecting conversion claim where the plaintiff could not identify specific sum but only approximate monetary losses
- plaintiffs alleging breach of contract must show that their damages were proximately caused 4 by the defendant’s misconduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fukuto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.