Vt Investors v. R & D FUNDING CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it would be “unnecessary and improvident” to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ state law claims once all of their federal claims were deemed meritless and subject to dismissal
• controlling person claims must be dismissed as a matter of law when the underlying core allegations are dismissed
• statements that company in which plaintiffs invested would soon generate positive cash flow in excess of $ 60,000 per month “puffery” because it was an emphatic statement of opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).