Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

V.S. International, S.A. v. Boyden World Corp.

Citations

  • 862 F. Supp. 1188
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13925
  • 1994 WL 543513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although plaintiff may have given defendant written notice and an opportunity to cure the breach, he did not terminate the contract and thus elected to continue it
  • “Plaintiffs cannot elect to continue with the contract, continue to receive the benefits from it, and thereafter bring an action for rescission or total breach”
  • “[P]laintiffs cannot contend that their start-up expenses were rendered useless” where they “have continued to receive the benefits of their investment, and have shown no actual damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.