Vrla v. WESTERN MORTGAGE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, merely because the parties agreed to compensate the plaintiff from a construction loan that was never obtained, it did not necessarily follow that the parties intended to leave the plaintiff uncompensated when the loan did not materialize
• contract that provided that architect was to be paid “from the proceeds of a construction loan” to be obtained by defendant did not establish a condition precedent for the architect’s receipt of payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).