Vredenburgh v. Lagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in the context of arbitration, that parties can waive their rights to move to compel arbitration by “substantial invocation” of the judicial process
• holding, in the context of arbitration, that parties can waive their rights to move to compel arbitration by “substantial invocation” of the judicial process
• holding, in the context of arbitration, that parties can waive their rights to move to compel arbitration by “substantial invocation” of the judicial process
• in order to keep state and federal arbitration law consistent, court holds proof of waiver in arbitration context requires showing of prejudice
• failure to meet Rule 11 procedural requirements warranted denial of sanctions
• in order to keep state Waiver, in the context of arbitration, “relates to inherent and federal arbitration law consistent, court holds proof of unfairness—that is, a party's attempt to have it both ways waiver in arbitration context requires showing of prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).