Vredenburg Ex Rel. Vredenburg v. Sedgwick CMS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this court will not disturb the appeals officer's factual findings on judicial review if they are supported by substantial evidence
• explaining that this court reviews a workers' compensation decision for clear error or an abuse of discretion
• noting that this court reviews an appeals officer's decision in a workers' compensation matter for clear error or an abuse of discretion
• explaining that this court will not disturb the appeals officer's factual findings on judicial review if they are supported by substantial evidence
• explaining that the appeals officer's fact-based decisions will not be disturbed if they are supported by substantial evidence
• noting that the appeals officer's decision will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).