Skip to main content
· 1/22/2014

Vranish v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Citations

  • 223 Cal. App. 4th 103
  • 166 Cal. Rptr. 3d 845
  • 2014 WL 232973
  • 198 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319
  • 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Legislature has permitted unionized employees to seek and receive “alternative wage protections through the collective bargaining process”
  • rejecting similar argument that Section 514 did not apply “because the complaint allege[d] 1 clock work
  • permitting union-represented employees covered by valid CBAs to bargain over overtime rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ashmann-Gerst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.