Vossbrinck v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman barred plaintiff’s suit “ask[ing] the federal court to grant him title to his property because the foreclosure judgment was obtained fraudulently”
• holding that Rooker- Feldman barred plaintiff’s suit “ask[ing] the federal court to grant him title to his property because the foreclosure judgment was obtained fraudulently”
• holding that Rooker-Feldman barred plaintiff’s suit “ask[ing] the federal court to grant him title to his property because the foreclosure judgment was obtained 7 fraudulently”
• ruling that a federal court cannot “determine whether [a] state judgment was wrongfully issued in favor of parties, who contrary to their representations to the [state] court, lacked standing to foreclose”
• concluding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred plaintiffs request for title to the foreclosed property on the basis that the foreclosing parties had misrepresented their standing to foreclose and had submitted fraudulent title documents in state court
• holding that Rooker-Feldman bars plaintiff’s claim where plaintiff was “asking the federal court to determine whether the state judgment was wrongfully issued in favor of parties who . . . lacked standing to foreclose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).