Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a default judgment issued in connection with violations of the South Carolina Securities Act is nondischargeable in bankruptcy under section 523(a)(19)
• “South Carolina’s traditional approach to collateral estoppel, requiring that [the] matter be ‘actually litigated,’ is altered in § 523(a)(19) actions.”
• “South Carolina’s traditional approach to collateral estoppel, requiring that the matter be ‘actually litigated,’ is altered in § 523(a)(19
• “South Carolina’s traditional approach to collateral estoppel, requiring that the matter be ‘actually litigated,’ is altered in § 523(a)(19
• “Section 523(a)(19) parallels other nondischargeability provisions that require a determination outside the bankruptcy court as a condition precedent for finding the debt dischargeable.”
• “Res judicata, or claim preclusion, bars relitigation of claims that were or could have been raised in a prior proceeding between the same parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).