Vose v. Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between a party’s duty to preserve “potentially relevant” materials and the “separate analysis taken up under part three of the [traditional] spoliation doctrine” of whether lost materials were in fact “relevant” to the requesting party’s case
• “The duty to preserve evidence includes an obligation to identify, locate, and maintain, information that is relevant to specific, predictable, and identifiable litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).