Vose v. Philbrook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the combined effect of the policy’s weather exclusion and the policy’s deterioration exclusion
• granting summary judgment on the ground that a “Weather Conditions” exclusion applied
• “[C]ourts have recognized that an insurer’s reasonable reliance on an engineering expert's report for a coverage decision does not constitute bad faith.”
• “[C]ourts have recognized that an insurer's reasonable reliance on an engineering expert's report for a coverage decision does not constitute bad faith.”
• when plaintiffs’ wall fell down, evidence showed that it was the result of deterioration and thus the “wear and tear” exclusion applied
• “In removal cases, the amount in controversy analysis begins with a reading of the complaint filed in the state court as of the time the notice of removal was filed.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).