Skip to main content
· 9/12/1978

Vorzimer v. Kaplan

Citations

  • 362 So. 2d 451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol testimony must be sufficiently specific to establish a new meeting of the minds between the contracting parties which changed the terms of a written contract subsequent to its execution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson, Hubbart and Kehoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.