Skip to main content
· 2/3/1989

Vortanz v. Elmhurst Memorial Hospital

Citations

  • 534 N.E.2d 625
  • 179 Ill. App. 3d 584
  • 128 Ill. Dec. 443
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the dismissal in medical malpractice action after patient’s expert failed to appear for deposition on date ordered by trial judge was an abuse of discretion where the expert was not under the direct control of the plaintiff or his attorneys
  • “[S]ince the striking of pleadings and entry of judgment against a party as a result of the violation of a discovery rule or order is the most severe sanction that a court can impose pursuant to Rule 219(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.