Skip to main content
· 3/1/1916

Vorndran v. Franz

Citations

  • 62 Pa. Super. 405
  • 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 437

Syllabus

<p>Landlord and tenant — Agreement to pay water rent — Lease—Interest.</p> <p>Where an owner of two contiguous lots on one of which he resides, and on the other of which is located a factory, leases the factory under a lease by which the lessee covenants to pay for water used in the factory, and the lessor is compelled to pay a water rent bill charged up against the factory lot, he can recover such payment from the lessee.</p> <p>In such a ease where the plaintiff claims in the same suit interest on a note, but tbe jury returns a verdict for the exact amount of the water charge, without allowing the interest, the fact that a claim for interest was made but not sustained does not prejudice the defendant.</p>

Judges: Bice, Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.