Voravongsa v. Wall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering McDonnell Douglas framework as an alternative to 5 direct or circumstantial evidence of discrimination
• declining to excuse untimeliness of habeas petition based on petitioner's pro se status
• pro se motion for appointment of state post-conviction counsel not collateral review
• “With no predicate State post-conviction application having been filed in a timely manner, [petitioner] is not entitled to have the time- limitations period of § 2244(d)(1) tolled by virtue of § 2244(d)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).