Skip to main content
· 10/13/1987

Voorhees v. Shull

Citations

  • 686 F. Supp. 389
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13872
  • 1987 WL 46776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • which declined to follow different standards based on the nature of the right involved, relying on the rational relation test for all challenges but those based on particular First Amendment claims
  • rational regulations struck down because lack of guidelines created potential for arbitrary application
  • even rational policy must be effected through guidelines that insure against arbitrary application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mishler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.