· 3/15/1892
Vonderbank v. Schmidt
Citations
- 44 La. Ann. 264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant pledged plaintiff’s stock, redeemed it, and pledged it again; “therefore he was liable for [conversion] either as of the date of the first or the second hypothecation,” and plaintiff “could have selected one or the other”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.