Skip to main content
· 3/15/1892

Vonderbank v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 44 La. Ann. 264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant pledged plaintiff’s stock, redeemed it, and pledged it again; “therefore he was liable for [conversion] either as of the date of the first or the second hypothecation,” and plaintiff “could have selected one or the other”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.