Skip to main content

Vona v. Lerner

Citations

  • 72 Conn. App. 179
  • 804 A.2d 1018
  • 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court properly granted defendants’ motion for directed verdict in absence of expert testimony as to proximate cause
  • expert testimony serves to assist lay members of jury and presiding judge and to prevail on negligence claim, plaintiff must establish that defendant's conduct proximately caused injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dranginis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Vona v. Lerner

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.