Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 3/3/2004
Von Holt v. State
Citations
- 151 S.W.3d 1
- 85 Ark. App. 308
- 2004 Ark. App. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the Rule 404(b) limiting instruction did not cure the prejudice resulting from the evidence, where the evidence had no independent relevance
- holding the Rule 404(b) limiting instruction did not cure the prejudice resulting from the evidence, where the evidence had no independent relevance
- reversing and remanding on a Rule 404(b), in part, because the inadmissible evidence was the first evidence that the jury heard in the trial, as well as the first piece of evidence shown to the jury
- reversing and remanding on a Rule 404(b), in part, because the inadmissible evidence was the first evidence that the jury heard in the trial, as well as the first piece of evidence shown to the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karen R. Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.