Von Holdt v. A-1 Tool Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any loss under the CFAA “must be as a result of ‘interruption of service’”
• rejecting the argument that “loss does not require an interruption of service or damage to the computer or computer system”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).