Von Dunser v. SOUTHEAST 1ST NAT. BANK OF MIAMI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “under an absolute and unconditional contract of guaranty ... it is no defense that the creditor has lost security or has been negligent in regard to the protection of the collateral.”
• holding as a well-established principle that 6 under an absolute and unconditional contract of guaranty, it is no defense that the creditor has lost the security interest
• holding that the argument “that the bank has caused impairment of collateral, is an inadequate defense; by the express and unambiguous terms of the contract of guaranty appellant waived any duty on the part of the bank with respect to collateral held”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).