Volvo White Truck Corp. v. Chambersburg Beverage, Inc. (In Re White Motor Credit Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 363(f) could not be utilized, but that section 105(a) could be used to effect 363 sale free and clear of claims
• finding that sale free and clear precluded successor liability for tort claim arising after sale
• holding that S 363(f) precluded tort claims against asset purchaser
• holding that S 363(f) precluded tort claims against asset purchaser
• The bankruptcy court “is empowered to ‘issue any order, process or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title.’ 11 U.S.C. § 105(a). Included, is authority to interpret and clarify prior orders”
• debtor’s assets sold free and clear of existing tort claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).