Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corp. v. Key GMC Truck Sales, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To prove [a violation of the OMVDA for cancelation of a Heavy-Duty Truck Addendum], [Plaintiff] must show, first, that the [Addendum] is a “franchise” … and second, that the franchise was terminated without good cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).