Volk v. Casey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Washington has an adequate procedure for reimbursement for the taking of property .... Therefore, dismissal of Appellant’s claim on ripeness grounds was proper.”
• reservation is possible, preventing operation of res While Kentucky cites three cases for the proposition that judicata
• “[A] more general substantive due process claim cannot be brought if the claim is based on governmental conduct which implicates an enumerated constitutional right.”
• “A second concern we addressed in Armendariz, which was also a concern for Appellants in this case, was a loophole in takings law regarding the ripeness doctrine.”
• “The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that a land use restriction that does not ‘substantially advance legitimate state interests’ or ‘denies an owner economically viable use of his land’ effects a taking.”
• “However, we have expressly held that the failure of a plaintiff to raise a federal takings claim in state court does not preclude that plaintiff from bringing a subsequent federal takings claim in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).